Guide
Should I File NR73 Before Leaving Canada?
Understand what Form NR73 does, when it may help, and why many people prepare facts before asking CRA for a residency opinion.
What NR73 is for
CRA Form NR73 is a residency-status questionnaire for people leaving Canada or who have already left. CRA uses the facts provided to give an opinion about residency status.
Why preparation matters
The form asks about where you live, family location, assets, documents, memberships, employment, business interests, and return visits. Incomplete or inconsistent answers can create avoidable review risk.
Why many people do a risk review first
Submitting NR73 is an affirmative request for CRA to review your residency facts. A preliminary review can help you understand whether the facts look low, medium, or high risk before you decide whether asking CRA is worth it.
Residency is not a simple checklist
Canadian tax residency is a fact-specific analysis. CRA weighs significant ties, secondary ties, conduct, intent, filing history, and sometimes treaty rules rather than applying one universal bright-line test.
When to get help first
Support is especially useful if you kept a Canadian home, have family in Canada, own a Canadian corporation, have large investments, or are unsure whether departure tax applies.
How to Read the Risk
A strong exit file usually has two sides: evidence that Canadian residential ties were severed, and evidence that ordinary life was established somewhere else. The table below is a practical screen for the facts most likely to change the review priority.
| Planning factor | Cleaner fact pattern | Higher-risk fact pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Using NR73 first | Can produce a CRA opinion when facts are complete, consistent, and relatively low complexity. | Places detailed facts directly before CRA before evidence gaps, contradictions, or complex assets are reviewed. |
| Risk review first | Organizes facts, identifies weak points, and helps decide whether NR73, filing, or escalation is appropriate. | Does not replace CRA’s opinion or a formal professional tax opinion when the file is complex. |
| Evidence quality | Answers are supported by dated housing, family, travel, work, document, and foreign-residence records. | Answers rely on intent, rough memory, or inconsistent dates across immigration, tax, and banking records. |
Practical Examples
NR73 after a fact review
Facts: The taxpayer drafts answers, gathers evidence, reconciles travel and family dates, and identifies two issues for CPA review before deciding whether to submit NR73.
Planning lesson: The strongest NR73 files are organized before CRA reviews them; the form should not be the first time inconsistencies are discovered.
Premature NR73
Facts: A person files NR73 while the Canadian home, spouse, health card, and employer remain unchanged, hoping CRA will confirm non-residence.
Planning lesson: Filing can draw attention to high-risk facts. A preliminary review may show that a stronger factual file is needed first.
Key Facts
- NR73 is a request for CRA to give an opinion on residency status; it is not mandatory for every departure.
- The form asks for detailed facts about family, housing, property, documents, business, travel, and foreign ties.
- Many people prefer to review risk and organize evidence before asking CRA to examine their facts.
- A preliminary review can help decide whether NR73, a filing position, or professional advice is the better next step.
Evidence to Gather
- Draft answers to each NR73 theme before submitting anything to CRA.
- A written departure timeline with dates for home, family, work, documents, tax registration, and travel.
- Documents supporting severed Canadian ties and newly established foreign ties.
- List of uncertain facts, inconsistencies, and issues requiring CPA or tax lawyer review.
Common Mistakes
- Treating NR73 as a routine form instead of a detailed factual submission to CRA.
- Submitting incomplete answers that leave CRA to infer the missing context.
- Filing NR73 before deciding whether the facts support the result you hope to obtain.
- Using NR73 as a substitute for professional review when complex assets, treaty residence, or departure tax are involved.
When to Escalate
- You kept a Canadian dwelling, spouse or partner, dependents, or significant business ties.
- You have private company shares, trusts, stock options, crypto, or substantial unrealized gains.
- You need a residency position for multiple countries at once.
- CRA has already contacted you about benefits, filing status, or residency.
Related CanadianExit Resources
Recommended next step
If your facts include a Canadian home, family in Canada, business ownership, major assets, or an unclear departure date, start with the free quiz or the Exit Risk Diagnostic. If you are comparing countries, review the jurisdiction shortlist.
FAQ
Is NR73 required to become non-resident?
No. NR73 is a way to request CRA’s opinion. Residency status still depends on facts, filing positions, and applicable law.
Can CanadianExit file NR73 for me?
CanadianExit helps organize the factual package. Formal filing or advice can be escalated to a qualified CPA or tax lawyer when needed.
Sources
Tax residency and relocation planning are fact-specific. These pages link to official or primary references used for this article.
- CRA Form NR73, Determination of Residency Status
CRA page last modified April 24, 2025. - CRA Income Tax Folio S5-F1-C1, Determining an Individual’s Residence Status
CRA administrative guidance on residence status and residential ties.